What is likely to happen if an organization merely changes its terminology to Scrum without proper understanding?

When an organization merely changes its terminology to Scrum without a proper understanding of the framework and its principles, it can lead to several outcomes.

One significant consequence is that the benefits of Scrum will not be realized. Scrum isn't just about adopting new terms but entails a shift in mindset, practices, and culture to enhance collaboration, transparency, and iterative progress. Without a deep comprehension of how to implement these principles effectively, teams may continue operating as they did previously, which can stifle improvement and innovation.

Additionally, while management may experience a sense of familiarity with new terminology, that does not equate to actual progress or stress reduction. If the underlying practices and behaviors remain unchanged, the organization will likely encounter the same challenges they faced before adopting Scrum, potentially leading to frustration among teams.

While some changes may be perceived as minimal or manageable, the overarching theme is that simply renaming existing processes will not foster the transformation Scrum aims to achieve. Thus, all responses highlight potential realities within an organization that misinterprets or superficially adopts Scrum. This underscores the importance of thoroughly understanding and embracing Scrum principles to realize its full benefits.